What have you been thinking about? The lecture is almost 40 minutes in duration and is followed by a 30 minute question and answer session. The transcript below is slightly different to the audio talk but is from a talk of the same title and covers largely the same ground.
The ink of the scholar is more sacred than the blood of a martyr. As already mentioned page 39 Clement of Alexandria is known to have suppressed gospel material that did not suit him. As he explained in a letter, referring to the Secret Gospel of Mark: During Peter's stay in Rome he wrote an account of the Lord's doings, not however declaring all of them, nor yet hinting at the secret ones, but selecting those he thought most useful for increasing the faith of those who were being instructed.
But when Peter died as a martyr, Mark came over to Alexandria, bringing his own notes and those of Peter, from which he transferred to his former book the things suitable to whatever makes for progress towards gnosis.
Thus he composed a more spiritual gospel for the use of those who were being perfected What was in the original version of the gospel we may never know.
The original was suppressed and its existence denied.
Something similar seems to have happened to the story of Barabbas. The name Barabbas is composed of the elements bar son of and abba father. Were there two Jesuses, both claiming to be sons of God, and both arrested at the same time?
We may never know unless an earlier manuscript turns up. But scholars think it probable that there is more to the story than is related in surviving texts. Other important historical texts also suffered from tampering. The relevant passage does not occur in surviving manuscripts of Josephus, but authoritative Christian sources both Eusebius and Origen quote it.
It would appear that the passage was edited out of the text by the Pauline line, which had an interest in minimising the importance of James.
We know of many so-called heretics only through the works of their Christian enemies. The works of Helvidius are lost, and we know of them through the writings of St Jerome.
Jerome thought that virginity was better than marriage the line that came to be regarded as orthodoxwhile Helvidius held that Mary and Joseph had had a normal married life and that Jesus had younger brothers and sisters. As Jerome 's line came to be orthodox his ideas are well documented while those of Helvidius are not.
Similarly, we know of Gnostic ideas mainly through the writing of their mainstream Christian enemies. Marcion's ideas for example, or a distorted version of them, are known through Tertullian 's work Against Marcion.Evidence for Christianity [Josh McDowell] on benjaminpohle.com *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers.
Whether debating Marxists, college professors, or Islamic apologists, Josh McDowell's hallmark has always been to walk boldly into enemy territory and speak truth. /5(31). This book is based on the expectation that, with a growing number of adults becoming increasingly skeptical toward Christianity, there is a need for a solid body of Reviews: The ancient non-Christian interpretations (and critical commentaries) of the Gospel accounts serve to strengthen the core claims of the New Testament.
About Dr. John Oakes. John Oakes was born and raised in Connecticut. He earned a BS in Chemistry at the University of Connecticut in John became a Christian as a graduate student in as part of a campus ministry in Boulder Colorado. How do I convince a person that Christianity is the only true faith without appearing intolerant of other religions?
views Jesus said we must observe all the law of Moses in Matt , but Paul disagreed. EVIDENCE CHRISTIANITY IS TRUE Nov 19, by Michael MacKenzie. Kindle Edition. $ $ 0 Get it TODAY, Nov 3. 2 out of 5 stars 1. The Sinlessness of Jesus: An Evidence for Christianity May 3, by Karl Ullmann.